A Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Robot Selection Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information and Aczel-Alsina Bonferroni Means
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap1120241Keywords:
Aczel-Alsina Bonferroni means, Aggregation operator, Multi-Criteria Group decision-making , MCGDM, Robot SelectionAbstract
The process of identifying the most appropriate robot for a particular industrial task has grown challenging and more difficult in the fast-paced environment. It is merely driven by the complex evolution and continuous integration of modern characteristics and advanced features by various suppliers. Industrial robots are now widely available in the marketplace, each possessing a distinctive collection of skills, attributes, and requirements. However, the selection of optimal robots is heavily influenced by factors such as the manufacturing environment, product design, production system, and overall cost considerations. These factors directly impact the decision-making process. The ultimate goal for the decision maker is to pinpoint and choose the most suitable robot, capable of delivering the desired output while minimizing costs and catering to the specific requirements of the industry. So, to consider it, in this paper, the hybrid structure of the Aczel-Alsina (AA) and Bonferroni mean (BM) operators for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) environment has been proposed, which can show the interrelationship between the multiple criteria and assist the expertise in decision-making (DM) process. Moreover, the algorithm and methodology for the multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problem have been defined which is further utilized by solving a real-world problem to demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the proposed method. At last, the comparison analysis between prior and proposed studies has been displayed, and then followed by the conclusion of the result.
Downloads
References
Fu, Y., Li, M., Luo, H., & Huang, G. Q. (2019). Industrial robot selection using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 122, 103304.2019, 122, 103304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2019.103304
Seidmann, A., Arbel, A., & Shapira, R. (1984). A two-phase analytic approach to robotic system design. Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing, 1(2), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-5845(84)90006-1
Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1993). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 10(4), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-5845(93)90040-Q
Ge, L., Chen, J., Li, R., & Liang, P. (2017). Optimization design of drive system for industrial robots based on dynamic performance. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 44(6), 765-775. https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-10-2016-0251
Vukobratović, M., Katić, D., & Potkonjak, V. (1987). Computer-assisted choice of electrohydraulic servosystems for manipulation robots using complete mathematical models. Mechanism and machine theory, 22(5), 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(87)90060-7
Khouja, M., Booth, D. E., Suh, M., & Mahaney Jr, J. K. (2000). Statistical procedures for task assignment and robot selection in assembly cells. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 13(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/095119200129957
Magrini, E., Ferraguti, F., Ronga, A. J., Pini, F., De Luca, A., & Leali, F. (2020). Human-robot coexistence and interaction in open industrial cells. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101846
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation. Cognitive Robotics, 1, 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2021.06.001
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Fu, S., Xiao, Y. Z., & Zhou, H. J. (2022). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making method considering risk preference of decision-makers and its application. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11597. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15815-1
Atanassov, K. T (1999). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (pp. 139-177). Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_2
Detyniecki, M. (2001). Fundamentals on aggregation operators. This manuscript is based on Detyniecki’s doctoral thesis and can be downloaded from.
Yager, R. R. (2008). Prioritized aggregation operators. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 48(1), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.08.009
Akram, M., Alsulami, S., Khan, A., & Karaaslan, F. (2020). Multi-criteria group decision-making using spherical fuzzy prioritized weighted aggregation operators. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 13(1), 1429-1446. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200908.001
Senapati, T., Chen, G., & Yager, R. R. (2022). Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators and their application to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(2), 1529-1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22684
Zhang, X., Liu, P., & Wang, Y. (2015). Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy frank power aggregation operators. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29(5), 2235-2246. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-151699
Seikh, M. R., & Mandal, U. (2021). Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Granular Computing, 6, 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00209-y
Liu, P. (2013). Some Hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems, 22(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2248736
Irvanizam, I., & Zahara, N. (2024). An improved RAFSI method based on single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic number and its Harmonic and Arithmetic mean operators for healthcare service quality evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 248, 123343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123343
Rahim, M., Garg, H., Khan, S., Alqahtani, H., & Khalifa, H. A. E. W. (2023). Group decision-making algorithm with sine trigonometric p, q-quasirung orthopair aggregation operators and their applications. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 78, 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.051
Dong, Q., Yi, P., Li, W., & Wang, L. (2024). A Family of Aggregation Operators for Group Decision-Making from the Perspective of Incentive Management. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 26(2), 498-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01610-1
Yao, R., & Guo, H. (2022). A multiattribute group decision-making method based on a new aggregation operator and the means and variances of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 22525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27103-z
Hezam, I. M., Rahman, K., Alshamrani, A., & Božanić, D. (2023). Geometric aggregation operators for solving multicriteria group decision-making problems based on complex pythagorean fuzzy sets. Symmetry, 15(4), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040826
Attaullah, Rehman, N., Khan, A., & Santos-García, G. (2023). Fermatean hesitant fuzzy rough aggregation operators and their applications in multiple criteria group decision-making. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28722-w
Yager, R. R. (2009). On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50(8), 1279-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.004
Wang, L., & Li, N. (2020). Pythagorean fuzzy interaction power Bonferroni mean aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(1), 150-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22204
Perez-Arellano, L. A., Blanco-Mesa, F., Leon-Castro, E., & Alfaro-Garcia, V. (2020). Bonferroni prioritized aggregation operators applied to government transparency. Mathematics, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9010024
Li, D., Zeng, W., & Li, J. (2016). Geometric Bonferroni mean operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(12), 1181-1197. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21822
Jabeen, K., Ullah, K., Pedrycz, W., Khan, Q., Ali, Z., & Yin, S. (2024). Pythagorean fuzzy aczel-alsina power bonferroni mean operators for multi-attribute decision-making. Granular Computing, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00428-4
Jabeen, K., Khan, Q., Ullah, K., Senapati, T., & Moslem, S. (2023). An approach to MADM based on Aczel-Alsina power Bonferroni aggregation operators for q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Access, 11, 105248-105261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3270267
Ma, L., Jabeen, K., Karamti, W., Ullah, K., Khan, Q., Garg, H., & Yin, S. (2024). Aczel-Alsina power bonferroni aggregation operators for picture fuzzy information and decision analysis. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 10, 3329–3352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01287-x
Hussain, A., Liu, Y., Ullah, K., Rashid, M., Senapati, T., & Moslem, S. (2024). Decision algorithm for picture fuzzy sets and Aczel Alsina aggregation operators based on unknown degree of wights. Heliyon, 10 (6), e27548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27548
Ali, W., Shaheen, T., Haq, I. U., Alballa, T., Alburaikan, A., & El-Wahed Khalifa, H. A. (2023). A Novel Generalization of Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Aczel Alsina Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 23(19), 8105. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198105
Nayagam, V. L. G., Muralikrishnan, S., & Sivaraman, G. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1464-1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.055
Senapati, T., Mesiar, R., Simic, V., Iampan, A., Chinram, R., & Ali, R. (2022). Analysis of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aczel–alsina geometric aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Axioms, 11(6), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060258
Xu, Z., & Yager, R. R. (2010). Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 41(2), 568-578. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2010.2072918
Xu, Z., & Chen, Q. (2011). A multi-criteria decision making procedure based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 20(2), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-011-5163-0
Aczél, J., & Alsina, C. (1982). Characterizations of some classes of quasilinear functions with applications to triangular norms and to synthesizing judgements. Aequationes mathematicae, 25(1), 313-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189626
Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2010). Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26(5), 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.007
Zhang, Z. (2017). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Frank aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 28, 1471-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2143-1
Wu, L., Wei, G., Gao, H., & Wei, Y. (2018). Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Hamy mean operators and their application for evaluating the elderly tourism service quality in tourism destination. Mathematics, 6(12), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120294
Wang, W., & Liu, X. (2013). The multi-attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted geometric operator. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 66(10), 1845-1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.07.020
Xu, W., Yao, Z., Wang, J., & Xu, Y. (2024). A novel group decision-making method for interval-valued q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy information using extended power average operator and Frank operations. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10665-3
Al-Saeed, S., & AbdelAziz, N. M. (2023). Integrated Neutrosophic Best-Worst Method for Comprehensive Analysis and Ranking of Flood Risks: A Case Study Approach from Aswan, Egypt. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 5, 10-26. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-1121
Pandiselvi, M., & Jeyaraman, M. (2024). Fixed Point Results in Complex Valued Neutrosophic b-Metric Spaces with Application. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 17, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2024.17244
Irvanizam, I., Siraturahmi, M., Irwansyah, A. M. B., Nasir, P. F., Zulfan, Z., & Salwa, N. (2022). A Hybrid DEMATEL-EDAS based on multi-criteria decision-making for a social aid distribution problem. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom) (pp. 341-346). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberneticsCom55287.2022.9865435
Heidary Dahooie, J., Estiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Xu, Z. (2022). A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-fuzzy ARAS method for prioritizing high-performance innovation-oriented human resource practices in high tech SME’s. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(2), 883-908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01162-2
Ali, A. M., Abdel-Basset, M., Abouhawwash, M., Gharib, M., & Mohamed, M. (2024). N-type-2-ARAS: An efficient hybrid multi-criteria optimization approach for end-of-life vehicle’s recycling facility location: A sustainable approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 250, 123873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123873
Irvanizam, I., Marzuki, M., Patria, I., & Abubakar, R. (2018, September). An application for smartphone preference using TODIM decision making method. In 2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICELTICs) (pp. 122-126). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELTICS.2018.8548820
Mohamed, M., & Gamal, A. (2023). Toward sustainable emerging economics based on industry 5.0: leveraging neutrosophic theory in appraisal decision framework. Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, 1, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Raiha Imran, Kifayat Ullah, Zeeshan Ali, Maria Akram (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.